Welcome Back

Sign in to your PART66Online account

or use email
Forgot password?

Don't have an account? Register here

EASA Part-66 Exam Preparation
UK CAA Part-66 Compatible Australia CASA Part 66
Updated to EU 2023/989
Mobile Friendly

EASA Part-66 Exam Preparation Online

Practice with thousands of EASA Part-66 exam questions across all 17 modules, track your progress, and join a community of aviation maintenance engineers preparing for their licence. New to it? Read what EASA Part-66 is — the licence, modules and exams explained.

Every question explained: all 17,000+ EASA Part-66 questions come with a clear, regulation-grounded explanation shown the moment you answer — so you understand why, not just memorise the answer.

All content aligned with the latest Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/989 — covering categories A, B1, B2, B2L and B3. Also fully applicable to UK CAA Part-66 candidates — the UK keeps the same Part-66 modules, exams and 75% pass mark under UK Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014. UK CAA vs EASA → Valid prep for Australia's CASA Part 66 self-study exams too. CASA vs EASA →

Part-66 worldwide: the same module-based study also prepares you for Part-66-aligned exams in the UAE (GCAA CAR-66), Qatar (QCAR Part-66), Singapore (SAR-66), Hong Kong (HKAR-66) and India (DGCA CAR-66) and Kenya (KCAA), plus where EASA / UK-CAA Part-66 exams are sat locally in Egypt (ECAA) and Nigeria (NCAA).

Aircraft Type Training: practice question banks for the Airbus A320 (CEO & NEO), A220 and A330 and Boeing 737NG, 737 MAX and 787, organised by ATA chapter with worked answers and timed practice.

0
Questions
0
Tests Completed
0
Users
0
Modules
0
Aircraft Types

Fact of the Day

11. Aeroplane aerodynamics, structures and systems

Damage-tolerant design assumes cracks will develop and includes crack stoppers and tear straps so cracks remain detectable before reaching critical size.

Study Modules

Unlock all study notes — €99.99 one-time

900+ pages, 17 modules, lifetime access. First paragraph of each module is free to preview.

Learn More

Streak Challenge

Streak:

Loading question...

Correct!

Game Over!

streak

New Personal Best!

Personal best:

Streak Challenge

How many can you get right in a row?

Yesterday's Winner

Kapotasos 2

No streaks yet today. Be the first!

Recent Test Results

17. Propeller

by Vukasin

87%

17. Propeller

by Vukasin

87%

15. Gas turbine engine

by nikitzr

96%

17. Propeller

by Vukasin

90%

17. Propeller

by Vukasin

84%

Leaderboards

Full rankings

Top Performers · by average quiz score

Top Study Streaks · current active daily streaks

Recent Q&A Activity

S

Actually, C is correct for the general case, since a low blade angle presents the least air load and lets the engine accelerate to idle with minimum starter effort. On the PT6 the propeller is a free-turbine layout decoupled from the starter, and on most reversing installations it rests on the fine-pitch start locks rather than in feather, so C still applies.

svenj88 replied to JayACA's question ·3d ago

J

The PT6 starts with the blades in feather?

JayACA asked a question ·3d ago

P

Hello. Indeed, moved to module 2.

PART66Online replied to Tj Anderson's question ·8d ago

T

why is this here (coming from CASA system) this is a buit random

Tj Anderson asked a question ·8d ago

M

A. High fidelity means low distortion, Class A is most linear, Class C is efficient for RF but distorts too much for clean audio.

Marek_AME replied to udreacc's question ·18d ago

C

Why else would the cockpit indicator run off it as a synchronous motor if the tacho was not making AC? The aircraft tachogenerator is a 3 phase permanent magnet unit, so the output is a sinusoidal AC voltage whose frequency tracks the rpm, that is why it is sinusoidal even though the stem never says AC. Linear only describes voltage against speed, not the waveform, so it does not apply here.

carlosmd replied to udreacc's question ·18d ago

U

Class C is specially designed for RF and only that and can't be used for audio

udreacc asked a question ·19d ago

U

in the question it is not mentioned it is referring to AC

udreacc asked a question ·19d ago

M

B. You are right, question does not say series or parallel, marked answer fits the series case where XL and XC cancel and only resistor remains, in parallel it would be maximum instead.

Marek_AME replied to Wesley 's question ·25d ago

W

The question does not say if the LCR circuit is in series or parallel. Series RLC at resonance: XL and XC cancel, leaving only R. Impedance = low (just R, could be very low if R is small). Parallel RLC at resonance: XL and XC still cancel in terms of reactance, but because the components are in parallel, this results in high impedance — approaching infinite in the ideal case

Wesley asked a question ·25d ago

We use essential cookies to keep you signed in, plus anonymous analytics to understand how the site is used. Cookie-based analytics is set only with your consent. See our Privacy & Cookie Policy.